So yes, with what we have at hand, Smile is right and the developer is wrong. It wouldn't be the first time.
Thank you and good night.
I don't even understand why you guys waste your time with ^^ this bioshock dude.
The guy has an ego equal to a cat thinking its impossible to lose LOL...everyone is wrong , he is the only one speaking the truth.
Awesome vid. Although I got such a bad taste in my mouth when Redhamu said he wasn't touching the SP
Yeah, dude. I rarely, if EVER, play SP campaigns for games that have MP. That's just how I work. I'd much rather kill people & work their brains than the computer.
"It must atleast down them , i purchased that **bleep**"
Well armour is also a purchasable and must protect you from something.
People can leg shot and down you with armour , if HR or Military sniper is also 1 headshot down then whats the point of having armour? to protect against some bad players? i mean i just started sniping , im not that good with it but the result is mind blowing.sometimes on maps like Lake Side or University. they buff sniper rifles and it will be the only gun people use considering its not INSANELY difficult once you get used to it. mastering it is hard but doing alright with it is possible for everyone i guess.
Good vid Vironzz , keep it coming.
If you've just started sniping, perhaps you don't understand what's going on in with it all just yet? I'm not talking about the HR, which you can elect to START with. That gun is fine. I'm talking about the purchasable Military Rifle (400 for first purchase & only 4 bullets), which you zeroed in on.
HR Headshot vs Norm = Down
HR Headshot vs Armor = Armor shed
Military Rifle Headshot vs Norm = EXECUTION
Military Rifle Headshot vs Armor = Armor shed
In my mind, the 'Norm vs Armor' between the HR & Military Rifle don't match up. How do they have the Military Rifle have a one up on the HR on Norms (which I feel it should, since it IS a purchasable & comes w/ only 4 bullets), but that does not continue through against Armored foes? Military Rifle Headshot should at least DOWN an armored foe, no question in my mind. That IS the benefit of Armor in this situation, since without it I get to shoot half your face off for an insta-execution.
Macgruber is wrong yet he helped develop the game? Deluded. Scoot is right, even with Macgruber confirming our suspicions (in two different messages with clarification) FraggedNati-Infectus will have the final say anyway due to the bias in the match dispute of how it was handled/is being handled.
Still waiting for Munnsy's ticket to be seen. We await the decision and will advance accordingly to the decision made.
To everyone else interested in the commentary: I'm sorry about this (all the pointless chitchat which I know you guys don't even care about) on behalf of myself and my team. Thank you for all the positive feedback that you've posted it and I'm glad you've enjoyed it. Red is right in what he is saying about the HR and I fully agree. Thanks for watching Muddled thanks everyone. I will be doing more and I will be posting some FN action as soon as I can.
>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/VironZz
I'd appreciate it if you'd refrain from accusing FN of being corrupt or biased toward a single team. Other admins have been included in discussion over the match in question. Evidence has been provided by both sides and that is the sole basis of any decision. I've only been asked to take over since I am the game director of the TLOU ladder. I ask that all remain professional over whatever final decision is made. Thank you.