SOCOM 4: US Navy SEALs

[FROST_420]

Dirty_Walter wrote:
FROST_420 wrote:
Execrate wrote:
The same way con and s4 are good games they get bashed when compared to socom. I say make con2 no socom attached and keep it the way it is movement speed Armour side switching. Someone else can make a socom legacy
 I would still be playing S4 if we had 4v4s
Agreed.
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!
I find it funny how concerned some of you are with what title the box has on it. lol.

The name thing is not important or what I was in agreement for, I agreed to keeping Con. the way it is. Maybe a couple of things like jump to climb and map design but other than that I'm happy with the way it turned out.

[o-XxSoLo-o]

Jump to climb is cool but if the map designs are right it won't be needed. Alot of the features in s2 were ok but not needed. I can live without most of them, i can deal with changes. As long as the core is there and the game is good.

[BmSirhc]

Never bought Socom4, only tried the demo but def liked confrontation over it so I'd say yes I agree, go for it Slant6!

[A_P_E_X__KILLER]

FROST_420 wrote:
A_P_E_X__KILLER wrote:
FROST_420 wrote:
Execrate wrote:
The same way con and s4 are good games they get bashed when compared to socom. I say make con2 no socom attached and keep it the way it is movement speed Armour side switching. Someone else can make a socom legacy
 I would still be playing S4 if we had 4v4s
Agreed.
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!
Exactly how can Slant-6 do that when they failed at Socom Confrontation and their most recent title Resident Evil which by the way had similar shooting mechanics as Confrontation failed as well. Its quite obvious that even now they are incapable of making a great shooter. I say Sony needs to find someone new and more experienced!
Failed? how? Similar shooting mechanics? I wish, the hit detection was garbage imo. What we would be hoping for is a game at the level of Confrontation Coldfront, which I've been able to play and enjoy for 2+ years.
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!

Frost I am a little confused. Socom Confrontation failed and that is a fact. Even to this day the game is buggy and its missing tons of classic features. Just like the newest game for Slant it received poor reviews as well. This company is ill equiped in making a good or great shooter.

[S_L_I_C_K]

A_P_E_X__KILLER wrote:
FROST_420 wrote:
A_P_E_X__KILLER wrote:
FROST_420 wrote:
Execrate wrote:
The same way con and s4 are good games they get bashed when compared to socom. I say make con2 no socom attached and keep it the way it is movement speed Armour side switching. Someone else can make a socom legacy
 I would still be playing S4 if we had 4v4s
Agreed.
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!
Exactly how can Slant-6 do that when they failed at Socom Confrontation and their most recent title Resident Evil which by the way had similar shooting mechanics as Confrontation failed as well. Its quite obvious that even now they are incapable of making a great shooter. I say Sony needs to find someone new and more experienced!
Failed? how? Similar shooting mechanics? I wish, the hit detection was garbage imo. What we would be hoping for is a game at the level of Confrontation Coldfront, which I've been able to play and enjoy for 2+ years.
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!
Frost I am a little confused. Socom Confrontation failed and that is a fact. Even to this day the game is buggy and its missing tons of classic features. Just like the newest game for Slant it received poor reviews as well. This company is ill equiped in making a good or great shooter.

have you played orc?

[S--I--M--P]

FROST_420 wrote:
Dirty_Walter wrote:
FROST_420 wrote:
Execrate wrote:
The same way con and s4 are good games they get bashed when compared to socom. I say make con2 no socom attached and keep it the way it is movement speed Armour side switching. Someone else can make a socom legacy
 I would still be playing S4 if we had 4v4s
Agreed.
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!
I find it funny how concerned some of you are with what title the box has on it. lol.
The name thing is not important or what I was in agreement for, I agreed to keeping Con. the way it is. Maybe a couple of things like jump to climb and map design but other than that I'm happy with the way it turned out. 
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!

Agreed Frost.  The game is fine as is for me.  I wish they'd release a map pack for it and do what little polishing it needs.  I'm no programmer but it seems the engine is there, just build on it and give us some good classic maps.

How much would you be willing to pay for a fully loaded Socom I & II map pack from Slant 6 as an adder to Confrontation?

[o-XxSoLo-o]

Somebody needs to explain to you guys the difference between fact and opinion. Is it stated somewhere that any game that only sells a million copies is considered a failure? Even with it being online only and having its issues.

[Execrate]

$3 per map I would happy. $5 I would pay

[ICE-P1CK]

o-XxSoLo-o wrote:
Somebody needs to explain to you guys the difference between fact and opinion. Is it stated somewhere that any game that only sells a million copies is considered a failure? Even with it being online only and having its issues.

Confrontation was NOT a failure.  Especially for being online only.

Although lets get real for a second.....can you really take all the credit when you are coasting off a flag ship title's reputation all while spewing out lies and bull shit to the fans like "the best multiplayer ever...ever in any game"  and talking about how you're keeping to the core and then failing to deliver and giving a broken piece of trash to people.  In which the vast majority of the fan base was displeased to say the least.

[FROST_420]

S--I--M--P wrote:
FROST_420 wrote:
Dirty_Walter wrote:
FROST_420 wrote:
Execrate wrote:
The same way con and s4 are good games they get bashed when compared to socom. I say make con2 no socom attached and keep it the way it is movement speed Armour side switching. Someone else can make a socom legacy
 I would still be playing S4 if we had 4v4s
Agreed.
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!
I find it funny how concerned some of you are with what title the box has on it. lol.
The name thing is not important or what I was in agreement for, I agreed to keeping Con. the way it is. Maybe a couple of things like jump to climb and map design but other than that I'm happy with the way it turned out. 
Slant Six come back and save SOCOM!!
Agreed Frost.  The game is fine as is for me.  I wish they'd release a map pack for it and do what little polishing it needs.  I'm no programmer but it seems the engine is there, just build on it and give us some good classic maps.
How much would you be willing to pay for a fully loaded Socom I & II map pack from Slant 6 as an adder to Confrontation?
 S--I--M--P

I was just thinking about this last night and what you've described could net $50 $80 from me. I was recalling people saying how much they would pay for SOCOM and they were getting up there but if you take in consideration all the content of SOCOM2, one can see $120 in value.