
09-07-2012 06:16 PM
Always trollin...
harley7 wrote:
u still havnt answered me, how old are you?
and ive blamed sorny for socom since the get go, not people on the forum or some unspecific generation as you keep on doing.
09-07-2012 06:24 PM
09-07-2012 08:41 PM
harley7 wrote:
lolz apoc, b4 it was a certain generation (unspecified and undefined by u) causing socoms downfall, now its individuals. and of course sorny too.
harley7 wrote:
how old r u apoc?
harley7 wrote:
just to let u know, the op under all his psn names has repeatedly called out others on the forum with the "thats whats wrong with some generation" statement, so thats why i asked his age. lol u.
harley7 wrote:
cmon apoc, how old r u? what generation do you belong to? the forgotten generation? the next generation? the stolen generation?Then you say "discussing the thread topic is encouraged here, i know its a foreign concept to u" LMFAO this kid is hilarious.
harley7 wrote:
u still havnt answered me, how old are you?
09-11-2012 10:39 AM
xSTG-x-ASSassIN wrote:
harley7 wrote:
lolz apoc, b4 it was a certain generation (unspecified and undefined by u) causing socoms downfall, now its individuals. and of course sorny too.
harley7 wrote:
how old r u apoc?
harley7 wrote:
just to let u know, the op under all his psn names has repeatedly called out others on the forum with the "thats whats wrong with some generation" statement, so thats why i asked his age. lol u.
harley7 wrote:
cmon apoc, how old r u? what generation do you belong to? the forgotten generation? the next generation? the stolen generation?Then you say "discussing the thread topic is encouraged here, i know its a foreign concept to u" LMFAO this kid is hilarious.
harley7 wrote:
u still havnt answered me, how old are you?
uh, he was discussing the thread topic, you are the one that brought it up, he was just asking a question. did you forget? here, let me show you.
A_P_E_X__KILLER wrote:
My apologies. I have written a lot and can't remember what I have said. Either way doesn't sway how Sony treated us and their game. Here we are and instead of a game to play we have had 8 years of ignorance. I am also amazed how you can still worry about how or what I say when Sony is the true culprit here. Where is your priorities?
Goes to show you that you the younger generation follow as sheep rather than to stand apart as an individual. So who is the real problem? That is something you need to ask yourselves. Well good luck either way and have fun here with this dead community and game.
how old r u apoc?
see? you brought up the "younger generation" and he asked how old you were so he knew what generation you were from. you then went on rant after rant without answering the question. why are you afraid to answer? nobody else...well, almost nobody else here has a problem answering that question, what are you hiding from? are you part of that "younger generation" by chance?
so yeah, he was on topic, it was you that went off topic to avoid a simple question.
09-20-2012 08:47 PM
Ah Slick I still see you haven't learned a thing. As I said before my age is irrelevant. IN the scheme of things what difference does it truly make? The facts are in life all good things must come to an end. I and a few others knew that if we couldn't make a difference during development that in the end there was a chance for this game to end. So why not try to make a difference before its too late?
Prime example is seen with socom 4 being dead and buried with no news that there will ever be another socom. That's why I fought so hard to get classic socom over a newer version, I saw that there was nothing innovative or unique about casual made socoms and in the end I knew it wouldn't last. Personally I believe that a classic new socom would have outperformed in sales over what I was seeing in the newer versions of socom. Ironically now it doesn't matter what your perspective is for neither group has any socom game to play.
All I can say is that we have seen 4 socoms in which modification from classic into current shooter with each iteration doing worse and worse. It appears after all that no one here has seen the light that a current shooter socom will never be. IF we are lucky I can only hope that Sony has finally understood this point and will direct the next socom to go back to its roots and stay true to what it once was. If not then I can 100% say that new socom isn't for me.
09-21-2012 07:49 AM
A_P_E_X__KILLER wrote:Ah Slick I still see you haven't learned a thing. As I said before my age is irrelevant. IN the scheme of things what difference does it truly make? The facts are in life all good things must come to an end. I and a few others knew that if we couldn't make a difference during development that in the end there was a chance for this game to end. So why not try to make a difference before its too late?
Prime example is seen with socom 4 being dead and buried with no news that there will ever be another socom. That's why I fought so hard to get classic socom over a newer version, I saw that there was nothing innovative or unique about casual made socoms and in the end I knew it wouldn't last. Personally I believe that a classic new socom would have outperformed in sales over what I was seeing in the newer versions of socom. Ironically now it doesn't matter what your perspective is for neither group has any socom game to play.
All I can say is that we have seen 4 socoms in which modification from classic into current shooter with each iteration doing worse and worse. It appears after all that no one here has seen the light that a current shooter socom will never be. IF we are lucky I can only hope that Sony has finally understood this point and will direct the next socom to go back to its roots and stay true to what it once was. If not then I can 100% say that new socom isn't for me.
like my post said, YOU were the one that brought up the age thing. so you tell me, what does age matter?
and yes there is socom news, but you are to busy jumping up and down trying to get as much attention as possible and you missed all of it.
09-21-2012 08:49 AM
09-21-2012 10:28 AM
xSTG-x-ASSassIN wrote:
That isn't the thread topic. rofl That's one sentence, not even in the op. Even if that sentence was in any way the topic of discussion, how is posting "how old r u apoc?", "cmon apoc, how old r u?", "u still havnt answered me, how old are you?", staying on topic? It's not. Whatever his age is, it doesn't effect the statement. That is called trolling, something you do frequently SLICK.
agan , HE was the one that brought it up. are we not allowed to comment on anything except for the original post? if not then what are you doing here? you arent talking about the thread at all, you are complaining about people asking the op questions that he brought up..
Goes to show you that you the younger generation follow as sheep rather than to stand apart as an individual. So who is the real problem? That is something you need to ask yourselves. Well good luck either way and have fun here with this dead community and game.
all we want to know is what generation he is apart of. why is this top secret information? whats he hiding?
09-21-2012 10:40 AM
09-21-2012 10:44 AM
xSTG-x-ASSassIN wrote:
I really hope you aren't an adult. Picking out one statement and then repeatedly harassing the poster about a statement is trolling. Not to mention whether he is 15 or 50 is irrelevant. Whether he is criticising his own generation or a different one, what is the difference? Are you just looking for something else to troll about? You can't make a valid point.
i wasnt the one that was asking. you should pay attention.