11-13-2007 04:55 PM
11-13-2007 07:15 PM
11-14-2007 07:54 AM
11-19-2007 01:09 PM
Either you're blind or you're using an SD television.
Graphics ten? - you're on crack bro - it's more like a 5 out of ten to me. Looks exactly like a ps2 game. Shame on insomniac for being so lazy. Good graphics are on heavenly sword, ninja gaiden or even genji remember that launch title everyone bashed on? It's gameplay mihgt no be as goos as ratchet but graphics were ten thousand times better than this game, and that was a year ago...
11-23-2007 10:27 AM
11-23-2007 10:59 AM
11-23-2007 02:08 PM
I'd say the lack of enemies compared to prequels would be due to the new engine not being capable of processing so many enemies in such high resolution. If not, then perhaps Insomniac just decided to not put in as many enemies.
Honzou wrote:Yes, this game is awesome and far better than many other games out in the general market. My only two complains were the lack of quantity of enemies at a time, maybe it was because I loved the mayhem that R&C: deadlock and R&C3: Up to your arsenal offered lots of enemies and mayhem, R&C Future: Tools of Destruction lacked that excessive mayhem feel that won my heart. Also the lenght of the game was kinda short and the lack of multi-player; The short amount of the game isn't something that will kill the game, not even by an inch, its just that when you play it you'll want more of the game. The lack of multi-player made me feel a little sad since I couldn't go online and join the mayhem with the rest of the fans of the R&C series, but then again the arsenal that this game offered would make you wander if there is a server that could contain this game's mayhem and destruction.This game in my opinion gets a 9.75Why not 10 out 10? Simple they needed more disco song for the groovitron.