No mone is judging a book by it's cover, did you even read the article? LMAO there is a lot of evidence pointing to a poor game and IGN listed them. They are called FACTS.
I posted a faxctual article that outlines COD struggles and vita, sony defenders do the typical Crying Troll. How is that trolling? Please kknow what trolling is before spewing that garbage. I love my ps3 and vita, but I am not a blind sheep like some of you, vita is struggling right now thats a fact and COD is not looking good on vita. People throw around the wrod troll way too much now it's sucha copoout, maybe refute the actual facts I posted first clowns.
IMO, I think it would have been a safer and smarter option to just port Black Ops 2 to the Vita and sell that. Imagine if Sony got Activision to do a cross buy promotion with that! This would definitely sell more Vitas this year...
Not going to lie...I'd be alot more comfortable if they did just port it, simply because it'd be Treyarch developing both games and not the people who made Resistance.
Sorry but disagree, it's sony's jopb to ensure third parties properly support vita, its their job top sell the system to third parties and give them incentives to put effort and their top devs to be the ones making the game. Nihilistic is a sony studio, not activisions, so obviously sony was involved.
But CoD is Acti's franchise. Sony can't tell them what to do with it. I think the vast majority of the blame here goes to Acti, with a bit going to Sony for allowing it.
Edit: And no, Nihilistic is a second party developer. Other companies come to them to have games developed for them. Neither Sony nor Activision owns them. Which is unfortunate, because that means there wasn't any real reason to choose Nihilistic...but they did anywyas.