PlayStation® General

[Kjd1412]

I am thinking buying 1 of those games to play during Christmast break after fall semester in school. With my budget now, i can buy the AC ezio trilogy. MET is like $65, included tax. I havent played ME before, so it could be a nice experience for me to play. About AC, I want to catch up with the story of the series. I finished AC 2, then jump straight to AC 3. So i not really sure what was going on with the seires. Even tho there was a brief short movie in ac3 so i caught up a little bit about what happened from ac1 to revelation. both games are geat to me, but i want the best out of my $$$, such as DLC. AC Trilogy doesnt have every DLC as compare to MET. For fans out there, what is the better game to play?

[Bulletpainpills]

Yes

[Ghostwize]

Go with Mass Effect. You'll get far more replay value for your money hands down. Enjoy saving the galaxy!

[eagles1990]

Out of both, I enjoyed Mass Effect much more. I'd go with Mass Effect.

[jjbsn5192]

i would also go with Mass Effect had i not bought ME2 and ME3 last month i would have gotten the trilogy but i will just grab the Single Download for ME1 at some point.

[johngie]

Mass Effect trilogy. Lock yourself away for two weeks, play em end to end.

[Tim81DE]

Gotta agree with everyone here. Mass Effect (especially the first one) will be a treat!

[Kjd1412]

thanks guy, i'll consider getting this game when I got my first paycheck. I got hired for my 1st job so getting this game within a month will be no problem

[Hawkfan267]

Mass effect trilogy over the AC trilogy. Only because playing each Mass efffect game will take you 100's of hours each. AC trilogy is good, but isn't quite as deep as Mass effect IMO. BTW, isn't it great that PS3 owners can now play Mass effect 1? Fantastic. 

[Alleex47]

Mass Effect dude