Reply
Lombax Warrior
Registered: 09/20/2012
Offline
205 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

We won't know for sure since All-stars isn't out just yet... haha Probably will be since Super Bot is adding all these awesome these characters, that Nintendo wasn't thinking of adding !!!!! lol XDDDDDD

 

Heart RAYMAN Heart

RAYMAN'S GIRL/LOVER/WIFE/STALKER/ADMIRER 3333333333
My Account on Anivide!!!
http://www.anivide.com/user/Sexygamergirl

A GAMER.
A COSPLAYER
A FUN AND FRIENDLY ALSO HYPER GIRL.
REMEMBER THIS FOREVER.........
I AM A FOREVER RAYMAN FANGIRL AND GAMER.
A JIM CARRY FAN
I LOVE & SUPPORT THE FRENCH AND UK ACCENTS AND COUNTRY.




Message 11 of 55 (100 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Treasure Hunter
Registered: 02/25/2011
Offline
5310 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

ORGAN1ZAT10N_13 wrote:

Nocturnal__Gamer wrote:

PSASBR vs Any Smash Other than SSB1 is an unfair comparison when it comes to roster size.  It's highly suggested that roster vs roster is left out until PSASBR 3 or 2 but for now.  The roster count should always be Original All-Stars vs Original SSB since the original has to get its engine down before it works on roster size.


That's not really a fair comparison either. Smash 1 was running on VERY old technology, and All-Stars has an almost infinite amount of PS resorces at its disposal. That's like comparing Doom 1 (1991) and Doom 3 (2004). Of course Doom 3 will come out on top in terms of gameplay, content, etc. Stop trying to boost up All-Stars by unfairly comparing it to severly outdate tech of the N64 - 2 console gens ago

 


You're missing the point though, you can't compare an original to a sequel since the original is made entirely from scratch.  Unless it's original vs original the entire argument is invalid no matter how many points were made.  The fact the sequel wasn't built from the ground up and already has a base is what makes original vs sequel an invalid argument.

Message 12 of 55 (97 Views)
Gaming Beast
Registered: 09/11/2012
Offline
1859 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012
Also, you have to take into consideration, even though Super Smash Bros. 64 I very old and uses old technology, it doesn't change the fact that it was their FIRST game. PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale is SuperBot's first game, therefore, it is completely valid and able to be compared with Super Smash Bros. 64. It's ultimately fair.
Message 13 of 55 (95 Views)
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 07/24/2012
Offline
1660 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

OK it's unfair to compare but saying that PSABR does more fanservice dude... For real? 

Message 14 of 55 (90 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 07/21/2010
Offline
1735 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

Smash, however, wasn't set up for LTE the same way PS3 games are. So you really can't compare the 12 character roster on a Nintendo 64 cart to the 20 characters on the Blu-Ray disc + DLC later on. The only real way you can campare things like rosters is when Nintendo dabbles in DLC the same way. Otherwise, the playing field is way unbalanced.

 

Nintendo had to balance their characters, fine tune it, and ship it out never to be touched by dev hands again. SuperBot can access their work any time, make impreovements (balancing and whatnot) and add it to the game via patch. Comparing final work to a work in progress isn't fair

Message 15 of 55 (88 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 07/24/2012
Offline
1660 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

Yeah OK but comparisons on this forum don't mean **bleep** anyway... C'mon 80% of the people here never played Smash Bros. and don't own anything Nintendo-related. They only have a PS3 so like every kid in the universe they think everything else sucks. Who cares real gamers will figure that out.

Message 16 of 55 (81 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Treasure Hunter
Registered: 02/25/2011
Offline
5310 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

Original vs original is as fair as it will get.

Message 17 of 55 (79 Views)
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 07/21/2010
Offline
1735 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

Nocturnal__Gamer wrote:

Original vs original is as fair as it will get.


Maybe, but Final Product vs. Endless Work-in-Progress isn't fair.

 

Message 18 of 55 (74 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 07/24/2012
Offline
1660 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

Nocturnal__Gamer wrote:

Original vs original is as fair as it will get.


Yeah that' because you want to win easy. Suit yourself.

 

And the ironic fact is that the first Smash Bros. didn't miss any no-brainer character...

Message 19 of 55 (72 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Treasure Hunter
Registered: 02/25/2011
Offline
5310 posts
 

Re: Vs. Smash Bros

Oct 24, 2012

RexLozuresky wrote:

Nocturnal__Gamer wrote:

Original vs original is as fair as it will get.


Yeah that' because you want to win easy. Suit yourself.

 

And the ironic fact is that the first Smash Bros. didn't miss any no-brainer character...


Well there you go, it just got balanced out.  Although a good amoung of the characters in the PSASBR roster are no-brainers such as Kratos, Sweet Tooth, Sir Dan, Cole, Dante(Wrong One Though), Ratchet and Clank, Jak and Daxter, Toro, Drake, Sackboy, Parappa, Spike and Sly Cooper.  All of those characters are no-brainers in the PSASBR roster currently.

Message 20 of 55 (68 Views)
Reply
0 Likes