Who's more important to Sony???
Btw haters this was a made up example. Don't pick hairs
Don't quote me on this, but I remember reading an article a while back that dealt with people who are insecure about their genitalia size. It said that people who did have a small anomaly in the crotch area tended to point out how much smaller other people's genitalia are. They also seemed to behave in a more intrusive manner and tended to yell a lot for no appropriate reason. You might want to get that checked.
Sucker Punch owns Sly Cooper and Cole MacGrath, two characters that deserve to be represented. Sucker Punch wants Good Cole and Evil Cole to be separate characters, so they won't let SB get Sly without adding in both Coles. See how it works?
Oh, and Kat and Emmett aren't 'post-launch content.' They're DLC. They're meant to be paid for, but SB is letting people get them free for the first two weeks. They're not scamming us by charging for DLC.
Fresh to death
Picture it like this: Super Smash Bros has been made by one company (Nintendo) in which most of the representatives in the game come from their franchises that they own( aside from maybe Sonic and Snake). PSASBR is made by one company (Superbot) working for another ( In this case Sony). Superbot needed to ask for the representatives from other companies which makes it harder to put characters in the game, even if they are classic characters.