We've already known that kill confirms were intentional.
Thats how blind and retarded you people are
You know what? Instead of continuing this pointless blabbering, how aout i adderess all yall one at a time in a 1 v1.
Rival stage, no items, 5 stock. Mics on.
Just add me and i'll play when ready.
And if you would like a 2 v 2, im sure we can make arrangements for that as well
They were designed so you would be on your guard. To change up your tactic.
Its so easy to shrug off a super without a KC. Understanding that a KC is possible changes everything, it makes every level one super that more deadly.
There is one theory.
I appreciate the well-structured argument. Were this last month, I would have given you a well thought out argument in return. However, due to me arguing about this nearly endlessly since it's been brought up, I've gotten just plain tired of arguing.
All I do now is provide additional commentary and let people know when their own argument holds no value and has no way of standing against one that is thought out (in a rude way, usually, but it's the only way I can continue to enjoy myself well enough to keep being a part of this debate at all).
Just thought I'd be kind enough to tell you that.
Others may not appreciate this thread, but I certainly do. People do still cling to the idea that confirms were never planned and use it as a part of their arguments. Thanks for providing more evidence so people will know the truth. Kudos.
KC in 1v1 make the game competive and fun!
KC in FFA can get anyoing
KC in 2v2 can be fair unless its that easy bs that make you go "**bleep** how did he get both of us"
PS im a kc user for lvl 1 but will throw them out on appropriate times. I newly main Kat learnig Emmett/Sackboy, and bro mains Ratchet/Raiden