Reply
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/09/2009
Offline
4120 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

[ Edited ]
Feb 18, 2013
You realize yu didnt prove anything tonight right?

We've already known that kill confirms were intentional.

Thats how blind and retarded you people are

You know what? Instead of continuing this pointless blabbering, how aout i adderess all yall one at a time in a 1 v1.

Rival stage, no items, 5 stock. Mics on.

Just add me and i'll play when ready.

And if you would like a 2 v 2, im sure we can make arrangements for that as well
Message 61 of 137 (158 Views)
I Only Post Everything
Registered: 08/06/2012
Offline
914 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

[ Edited ]
Feb 18, 2013

I'm curious internet thug (khknight) who is your main in this game

meme3485470395
Message 62 of 137 (148 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 02/06/2009
Offline
1868 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

Feb 18, 2013
Khknight I though you where done here also why most you call people morons, idiots, that r word?!
Message 63 of 137 (147 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 01/03/2012
Offline
587 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

Feb 18, 2013

MercenaryDemon wrote:
They were designed so you would be on your guard. To change up your tactic.

 

Its so easy to shrug off a super without a KC. Understanding that a KC is possible changes everything, it makes every level one super that more deadly.

 

There is one theory.


I appreciate the well-structured argument. Were this last month, I would have given you a well thought out argument in return. However, due to me arguing about this nearly endlessly since it's been brought up, I've gotten just plain tired of arguing.

 

All I do now is provide additional commentary and let people know when their own argument holds no value and has no way of standing against one that is thought out (in a rude way, usually, but it's the only way I can continue to enjoy myself well enough to keep being a part of this debate at all).

 

Just thought I'd be kind enough to tell you that.

Message 64 of 137 (137 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 01/03/2012
Offline
587 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

Feb 18, 2013

Solid_Sword23 wrote:

I'm curious internet thug (khknight) who is your main in this game


He mains Jak.

Message 65 of 137 (129 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 07/28/2012
Offline
3755 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

Feb 18, 2013
Kknight about to shut them down. I'll start a drinking game in the meantime
Message 66 of 137 (121 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
I Only Post Everything
Registered: 08/10/2012
Offline
854 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

Feb 18, 2013

Others may not appreciate this thread, but I certainly do. People do still cling to the idea that confirms were never planned and use it as a part of their arguments. Thanks for providing more evidence so people will know the truth. Kudos.

Message 67 of 137 (116 Views)
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/09/2009
Offline
4120 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

Feb 18, 2013
Lol pb

Im just sick of this forum sh*t

Its time for action. Thats how i wanna prove a point.
Message 68 of 137 (115 Views)
Highlighted
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 02/02/2010
Offline
1808 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

Feb 18, 2013

My opinion:

 

KC in 1v1 make the game competive and fun!

 

KC in FFA can get anyoing

 

KC in 2v2 can be fair unless its that easy bs that make you go "**bleep** how did he get both of us"

 

PS im a kc user for lvl 1 but will throw them out on appropriate times. I newly main Kat learnig Emmett/Sackboy, and bro mains Ratchet/Raiden

Message 69 of 137 (105 Views)
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/09/2009
Offline
4120 posts
 

Re: UNDENIABLE PROOF that super setups (kill confirms) are intended

Feb 18, 2013
Quickfire, you have the first two so twisted backwards its not even funny.
Message 70 of 137 (95 Views)
Reply
0 Likes