Reply
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 12/12/2013
Offline
375 posts
 

Re: The no-1v1 Quick Match mode dilemma.

Dec 15, 2013
Oh, i'd have so much lulz with a 1v1 mode.

Choose good cole

Side square all day (stall)

Tbag/taunt at safe distance

Receive tonnes of hate

Lulz
Message 11 of 15 (175 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 01/10/2013
Offline
489 posts
 

Re: The no-1v1 Quick Match mode dilemma.

Dec 15, 2013
Considering the competitive scene is essentially dead, if a 1v1 queue isn't available, I'm probably calling it quits. It really is a simple addition that there's no reason not to implement and I know many players who, as you put it, "quit", because of the lack of 1v1 ability.

So no, there IS no rationalization for it to not be implemented.
.
Message 12 of 15 (164 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 09/27/2012
Offline
561 posts
 

Re: The no-1v1 Quick Match mode dilemma.

[ Edited ]
Dec 15, 2013

I'm getting really tired of rofl-stomping pubs in FFA...then in the following FFA matches, everyone just continously gangs up on me over and over and over and over again...even if I'm playing a low tier character, with the least amount of lives, and the least amount of AP at that point.

 

Or even worse...getting teamed up with a partner that is effective at two things: feeding AP and dying. Goes 0 - 3 leaving me to do all the work.

 

How bout I get some fair matches for a change Santa Monica? Add a 1vs1 queue. I'm tired of these handicaps...

Message 13 of 15 (146 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 12/12/2013
Offline
375 posts
 

Re: The no-1v1 Quick Match mode dilemma.

Dec 15, 2013
I can always carry you, bomb rider.
Message 14 of 15 (138 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Highlighted
Wastelander
Registered: 09/27/2012
Offline
561 posts
 

Re: The no-1v1 Quick Match mode dilemma.

Dec 15, 2013

Noone can carry an anchor that pulls you down...

Message 15 of 15 (125 Views)
Reply
0 Likes