Reply
Jan 01 2013
By: xL3G3NDx_189 Hekseville Citizen 293 posts
Offline

Ranked rule changes needed.

6 replies 156 views Edited Jan 1, 2013
Anyone else think rank should be stock with items and stage hazards off? I mean to me ranked should be the way tournaments are set and it would appear to me this is how most people are making them
Message 1 of 7 (156 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 09/07/2012
Offline
1807 posts
 

Re: Ranked rule changes needed.

Jan 1, 2013
Actually, SuperBot has stated that in their own tournaments that do Kill Limit (5) 2v2
Message 2 of 7 (150 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 09/07/2012
Offline
1807 posts
 

Re: Ranked rule changes needed.

Jan 1, 2013
With items and hazards on, btw
Message 3 of 7 (148 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 08/03/2012
Offline
342 posts
 

Re: Ranked rule changes needed.

Jan 1, 2013

I think that should be an option for ranked matches, the only problem that I could see was that it could end up going on forever and the two people who are dead could be stuck watching a super long match. I think there should be a very small  3 minute timer for ranked matches that would appear when only 2 people are left and if it ran out, it would go to a overtime to end what could be a 20 minute match.

 

for 2v2 the timer could be triggered when theres only 1 live left for each member of the team

PSN: tha_jammer

ABE and CHIMERA FOR PSASBR
Message 4 of 7 (144 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Sackboy
Registered: 09/07/2009
Offline
451 posts
 

Re: Ranked rule changes needed.

Jan 1, 2013

I could not disagree more, especially for FFA. FFA stock is a flawed mode in this game because you can beat the **bleep** out of any player and then do a 100% hit confirm on the player that you fear the most. On top of that you can get 1 kill and win a game against someone who has like 8 kills. 2v2 stock would be ok.

____________________________________________________________
Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale Accomplishments:
1st Ever rank 999 (only for full game, not beta)
1st Ever Double Black Belt In 1st 2 seasons (2v2 and Free For All)
1st Ever Black Belt (Acquired in Free For All)
1st Ever 2v2 Player to 300, 400, 500-1300 wins
1st Ever 2v2 Player to Black Belt level 300
1st Ever Free For All Player to Black Belt level 100
2nd Ever 2v2 Black Belt
Message 5 of 7 (134 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 12/02/2012
Offline
293 posts
 

Re: Ranked rule changes needed.

Jan 1, 2013
I would agree with you in ffa. But 2v2 and eventual 1v1should be stock Imo. Everything no items or hazards
Message 6 of 7 (111 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Splicer
Registered: 09/23/2012
Offline
44 posts
 

Re: Ranked rule changes needed.

Jan 1, 2013

Stock is terrible. All Matches can easily stretch to 10 minutes with the right characters. Characters like Jak who don't touch the ground ever will easily dominate. Time forces characters to approach and adapt based on time left. With stock, there is no adapting.

Message 7 of 7 (106 Views)
Reply
0 Likes