Reply
I Only Post Everything
Registered: 10/07/2010
Offline
1169 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
@khknight See that's where you're still wrong, all 3 of Sir Daniels are horrible. Sweet Tooth has a meh level 1 and a horrible level 2 and his level 3 is very easy to dodge, Heihachi's level 1 and 2 are both horrible though his level 2 is partly down to the AI making Kuma do stupid things and his level 3 in general isn't that impressive beyond at least gaurenteeing 1 kill. All 3 of Kratos' supers are unimpressive with not one standing out as being any way good to make up for the rest.

In fact most level 2's are easily stopped by a lot of characters who have good level 1's. Big Daddy, Fat Princess, Nariko, PaRappa and so on can all be killed by the previously mentioned good level 1's like Ratchet and Sly's.
Message 71 of 162 (86 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Survivor
Registered: 09/17/2012
Offline
2454 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
@red_ring

Okayyy sooo

Online proves an imbalance.
Online proves (noun 1) a lack of balance

Am struggling to see how exactly it is wrong?
Am not arguing i just think you have jumped on the high horse trying to pick out peoples mistakes (if it is one) just so you can 'appear' more intelligent which doesn't work as its plain rude and very childish and completly changed the subject that this thread was about.

IF i did make a mistake or stuck a word in the wrong place or even put a word in there that isn't even meant to be there.....

SO WHAT??? Who gives a flying f**k you obviously knew exactly what i meant and am sure others did as they weren't childish enough to mention it.

And if it was a big deal why write it as a comment? You could of pm'd me but no we got to act like a kind..... Grow up
Message 72 of 162 (84 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 10/17/2012
Offline
3293 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
I main nariko. I don't think I found any kill confirms. But her combos are legendary.


this is me helping
Message 73 of 162 (83 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 07/27/2012
Offline
240 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013

GaleDaWindMasta wrote:

Red_Ring_Ryko wrote:

Nariko has no confirms, only setups. As a result, people know how to avoid her setups. As a result, she gets no kills worth a **bleep** on anyone with half a brain to roll toward her when they hear the super activate. Ask Nariko mains how fun that is.


Nariko is a very large exception, you have to admit.


She wouldn't be, with your suggestions.

Message 74 of 162 (82 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Survivor
Registered: 12/09/2012
Offline
2365 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
Ask a Jigglypuff main how much they like... Existing. Smiley Tongue
Message 75 of 162 (81 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 10/17/2012
Offline
3293 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
Because online is not the standard in which fighting games are measured.


this is me helping
Message 76 of 162 (80 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
I Only Post Everything
Registered: 10/07/2010
Offline
1169 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
@khknight I'm not defending the way they are just now, they are flawed.

What I think needs done is to just tweak how many each character gets depending on how good their supers are in general. Right now having some characters with 6 ways to land their good level ones easily while others only have setups that "might" work is flawed. But if every character had supers that were much more equal and maybe only had 2 half decent ways to land a super off of a hit is fine so long as the super can still stand on it's own without being too powerful either.
Message 77 of 162 (76 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 01/03/2012
Offline
587 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013

Red_Ring_Ryko wrote:

GaleDaWindMasta wrote:

Red_Ring_Ryko wrote:

Nariko has no confirms, only setups. As a result, people know how to avoid her setups. As a result, she gets no kills worth a **bleep** on anyone with half a brain to roll toward her when they hear the super activate. Ask Nariko mains how fun that is.


Nariko is a very large exception, you have to admit.


She wouldn't be, with your suggestions.


Blame the game design. Not my arguements.

Message 78 of 162 (75 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 01/03/2012
Offline
587 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013

Aylas_Hero wrote:
Ask a Jigglypuff main how much they like... Existing. Smiley Tongue

I've seen some pretty dangerous Jigglypuff mains in my time, actually.

 

That little ball of cuddliness is not one to underestimate. XD

Message 79 of 162 (61 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 10/17/2012
Offline
3293 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
Gale. you are in yhe danger zone for beijg stupid with that last post. Please read your reply.


this is me helping
Message 80 of 162 (60 Views)
Reply
0 Likes