Reply
Survivor
Registered: 09/17/2012
Offline
2454 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
@red_ring_ryko
sorry what?
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/dict.aspx?word=imbalance

Am pretty sure noun 1 means a lack of balance?



Message 61 of 162 (113 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 07/27/2012
Offline
240 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013

khknight wrote:

I'm sick and tired if people saying adapt. I can adapt, but. DOES NOT make the game good or better.

 

a bad will still be a bad game.


Ready for the rebuttal?

 

It's not a bad game.

 

Let's agree to disagree?

Message 62 of 162 (111 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 07/27/2012
Offline
240 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013

RikkiRossTheBoss wrote:
@red_ring_ryko
sorry what?
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/dict.aspx?word=imbalance

Am pretty sure noun 1 means a lack of balance?




Your example is not what imbalance means, I don't know how else you want me to say that.

Message 63 of 162 (109 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/09/2009
Offline
4120 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013

Red_Ring_Ryko wrote:

khknight wrote:

I'm sick and tired if people saying adapt. I can adapt, but. DOES NOT make the game good or better.

 

a bad will still be a bad game.


Ready for the rebuttal?

 

It's not a bad game.

 

Let's agree to disagree?


Its not a bad game, but kill confirm spammers and defenders RUIN THE GAME.

 

if this **bleep** takes over the whole game, then it will be a BAD GAME.

Message 64 of 162 (98 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 07/27/2012
Offline
240 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

[ Edited ]
Jan 1, 2013

khknight wrote:

Red_Ring_Ryko wrote:

khknight wrote:

I'm sick and tired if people saying adapt. I can adapt, but. DOES NOT make the game good or better.

 

a bad will still be a bad game.


Ready for the rebuttal?

 

It's not a bad game.

 

Let's agree to disagree?


Its not a bad game, but kill confirm spammers and defenders RUIN THE GAME.

 

if this **bleep** takes over the whole game, then it will be a BAD GAME.


Ready?

 

No it doesn't; no it won't.

 

You're not providing evidence, you're screaming for an upheaval because you don't happen to like something.

Message 65 of 162 (93 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 10/17/2012
Offline
3293 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013
Rkr. These people do not know games like you or I. I wonder if their Call of Duties and Battlefields have taught them more about game mechanics than Final Fantasy 8 could.

Actually, I don't. nor do I care, because you can't fix stupid.


this is me helping
Message 66 of 162 (90 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 01/03/2012
Offline
587 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013

TwistedAvenger wrote:

I'm fine with them being in the game it's up to you to adapt and avoid them, but at the same time I think every character should have at least 1 I don't see how it's fair that some have them while others don't. The argument that people like Spike and Heihachi to me is inadmissible imo just because their level 1 supers may not be as good as someone's like say Sly I don't think that they should be entitled to have a hit confirm into and that Sly shouldn't be entitled to one based on who has the better super.


I thank you so much for being reasonable. Every other response against me has felt like an attack and it's really been taking a toll on me to fight back.

 

I respect your opinion, but even with every character having one confirm, you'd still have everyone desperately fighting to land that confirm. It'd make the game much less fun in my opinion if everyone had the ablility. That's why I think having no confirms and keeping setups would be ideal.

Message 67 of 162 (85 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 01/03/2012
Offline
587 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

[ Edited ]
Jan 1, 2013

khknight wrote:

I'm sick and tired if people saying adapt. I can adapt, but that DOSE NOT make the game good or better.

 

a bad will still be a bad game.


It's not a bad game. You wouldn't be playing it if it was lol. It's just kill confirms that bring it down a bit.

 

EDIT: I'm very late in replying, it seems.

Message 68 of 162 (78 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 07/27/2012
Offline
240 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

[ Edited ]
Jan 1, 2013

Nariko has no confirms, only setups. As a result, people know how to avoid her setups. As a result, she gets no kills worth a **bleep** on anyone with half a brain to roll toward her when they hear the super activate. Ask Nariko mains how fun that is.

Message 69 of 162 (74 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 01/03/2012
Offline
587 posts
 

Re: My last argument for those who defend the use of kill confirms.

Jan 1, 2013

Red_Ring_Ryko wrote:

Nariko has no confirms, only setups. As a result, people know how to avoid her setups. As a result, she gets no kills worth a **bleep** on anyone with half a brain to roll toward her when they hear the super activate. Ask Nariko mains how fun that is.


Nariko is a very large exception, you have to admit. Not even her Level 2 is all that great and is very easy to avoid. She has a great Level 3, but it's not that practical in certain situations.

 

I kind of want them to buff her supers, but she does have some pretty devastating, AP generating combos that almost balance her out when she's played well.

Message 70 of 162 (64 Views)
Reply
0 Likes