We're both lawyers.
Solid Snake being in Smash really means nothing.
Thank you! Finally someone who has some sense! He was nothing but a GUEST CHARACTER. Just because he made a cameo somewhere else, means he can't appear where he truly belongs?! Hell no!... The only thing I'm worried about is the MGS Ground Zeroes reveal. It definitely has me thinking that Big Boss will get in over Snake, which bums me out big time. Although I realize they would probably be the same gameplay-wise (except OctoCamo?), and would essentially be skin swaps, it would still be very hard for me to accept the main protagonist of MGS not being in. Big Boss is a great character too for his own reasons, but there's no replacing Snake, no matter how hard Kojima tries!
Big Boss would be a good hand to hand candidate with some firearms thrown in. Big Boss is IMPORTANT to the canon of MGS. eople say "snake is in brawl" because if we put Solid Snake into PSASBR people if any move resembles SSBB then people have more ammunition to say rip off and we want this game to avoid any of the negativity, if we put Big Boss in we are in a sense putting a different character. I would be fine with Big Boss and would readily accept him.
First off... Since it's Big Boss, and not Solid Snake... You're entire topic is kinda pointless. Ground Zeroes has no effect on the look of Snake since, as stated, it's not Solid Snake.
Second, yeah if another Metal Gear rep is going to make it into the game, it would probably be Big Boss, which is awesome.
Actually it isn't pointless because if they announces Big Boss before Ground Zeroes in his new attire would have spoiled the Ground Zeroes annoument since everyone would have known there was a new MGS coming out with Big Boss as the main character.
and again, solid snake/big boss is to iconic to let raiden alone represent the mgs franchise.
just wait and see.
big boss is should be . and he can use cqc different grandes. use shagohood. will be unique !