In a thread discussing how Sackboy is broken now, one guys argument was that sackboy is fine, and that once all the top characters get nerfed then he will be balanced. This makes no sense on so many levels, haha. It's like the majority of this board's posters are elementary kids on their lunch break.
As well, there's dozens of threads about Sackboy's nerf and whether he is still good or not. I'm telling people who say that he isn't broken competatively (he's still fun in stock/quick matches without a time limit) to record a video of them winning a ranked match, playing as sackboy, against good players. Until that happens than discussion is pointless. And of course one of the next responses is that Sackboy is actually better post-patch. Uggghhh...
Ratchet's Lv 1 Super Killed me that once, FIX IT!
Sweet Tooth gets too many Lv 1 Supers, FIX HIM!
Nariko's Lv 3 lasts too long, SHORTEN IT!
Drake killed me 2x because his Lv 3 locks on to you, FIX IT!
Sackboy gets his LV 3 too fast, REDUCE HIS AP GAIN!
Sackboy doesn't get his supers anymore because he was nerfed, FIX HIM!
You people are pathetic
The one I bolded was legit, the others are just stupid.
TwistedAvenger I'm not sure why you take me as a child. I'm reasonable enough to admit when I am wrong.
If you upload a video of you winning a ranked match as sockboy, against good players (purple belt or higher, some greens may be decent as well) by any amount, than I will concede. Simple as that. To be fair, be honest with however many matches you had to play before you actually won. But regardless, even if it took you 30 matches to win 1 against good players, I will stop saying that Sackboy is broken competatively. So go ahead and prove me wrong, unless of course Sackboy isn't as powerful in ranked play as you say he is