I am sick of these threads that rip on Kat. I enjoy Kat and i am a lot better with her than Emmet because i just can't a grasp on his playstyle but Kat is fine the way she is. I mean the characters just came out and alot of people are already whining and crying for a nerf i am disgusted. You have to give time to develop a strategy against Kat you can't just charge at her because if you do you are just begging to be combo'd. I mean what next people are going to want to nerf Emmet? If anything look at the characters that should have a look at i mean just because Kat and Emmet are out doesn't mean they are the only characters that exist. The DLC is given for free for the first two weeks which i think was just generous of Sony and some people still aren't happy. I swear a majority of this community is never happy with what they are given.
It's like the concept of building a strategy against the way characters are played has gone out the window
I stand by my stance that Kat was created with sexist purposes to appeal to male gamers and her "fashion"/"costumes" furthur prove my point. If you can't see this you're stuck in a chauvinistic point of view.
Start seeing equality instead of sexuality man.
First, don't approach Kat like any other character. He has her vuneralbilites in FFA. Jak has no problem with her since he is just as maneuvarible, and has way more anti air than her.
1v1 however, it's like the didn't care about balance. Not only does she the most KC's, he has the ONLY KC where the opponent can be in the AIR prior to starting the setup. Every other KC requires your oponent to be on the ground.
Right now, the meta is to stay off the ground to avoid KC. Kat is going to affect the meta. Now this would be fine if more than Kat had a KC that affect aerial oppoents, but the fact that ONE fighter will affect the entire meta game is beyound stupid.