Reply
I Only Post Everything
Registered: 10/24/2012
Offline
1147 posts
 

Re: Jak and Daxter missing taunt (SuperBot)

Nov 21, 2012

LightEcoSage wrote:

Levi_Skardsen wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

Levi_Skardsen wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

joblade wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

Goes to show how immature all you people are. Its like you just skipped what happened on the first page... sighs..


I saw how it went it wasn't you who started it but you added to the fire, sometimes you just have to let things go man otherwise you will always end up in arguments and I'm sure you don't want that.


If you read everyline I didnt really add more fire until later on. I tried acting calm and stuff but these guys were just trying to pi-ss me off. I ignored Barker first reply but then he just decides to post another pointless reply because he wanted to start things.


Why can't you just ignore things like that? You let yourself get baited all the time and then you play the victim while arguing over nothing.

 


Because I was seeing how far I can get if I ignored barker 1st comment and trying to be calm with Frog but it didnt work as you can see if you read the whole t hread.

 

Anyways im making another Jak thread... lets see how this one goes Smiley Happy 


My point is that it's not a big deal, so don't make it into one. It's only an internet forum.

 


I wasnt expecting this reply from you so now I got to reply. This appies to you and everybody else who was argueing with me as well. So why cant you and everybody else do the same?

 

Oh yeah and once again again, I did to an extent.


I wasn't arguing with you at all. You need to read what I was saying in the context I used. If you do so, without getting defensive about it, you'll realise I wasn't.

Message 51 of 54 (85 Views)
0 Likes
Highlighted
Splicer
Registered: 09/11/2012
Offline
64 posts
 

Re: Jak and Daxter missing taunt (SuperBot)

Nov 21, 2012

Levi_Skardsen wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

Levi_Skardsen wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

Levi_Skardsen wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

joblade wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

Goes to show how immature all you people are. Its like you just skipped what happened on the first page... sighs..


I saw how it went it wasn't you who started it but you added to the fire, sometimes you just have to let things go man otherwise you will always end up in arguments and I'm sure you don't want that.


If you read everyline I didnt really add more fire until later on. I tried acting calm and stuff but these guys were just trying to pi-ss me off. I ignored Barker first reply but then he just decides to post another pointless reply because he wanted to start things.


Why can't you just ignore things like that? You let yourself get baited all the time and then you play the victim while arguing over nothing.

 


Because I was seeing how far I can get if I ignored barker 1st comment and trying to be calm with Frog but it didnt work as you can see if you read the whole t hread.

 

Anyways im making another Jak thread... lets see how this one goes Smiley Happy 


My point is that it's not a big deal, so don't make it into one. It's only an internet forum.

 


I wasnt expecting this reply from you so now I got to reply. This appies to you and everybody else who was argueing with me as well. So why cant you and everybody else do the same?

 

Oh yeah and once again again, I did to an extent.


I wasn't arguing with you at all. You need to read what I was saying in the context I used. If you do so, without getting defensive about it, you'll realise I wasn't.


Ok it seems like everyone else finally dropped this. Now can we?

Message 52 of 54 (83 Views)
0 Likes
I Only Post Everything
Registered: 10/24/2012
Offline
1147 posts
 

Re: Jak and Daxter missing taunt (SuperBot)

Nov 21, 2012

LightEcoSage wrote:

Levi_Skardsen wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

Levi_Skardsen wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

Levi_Skardsen wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

joblade wrote:

LightEcoSage wrote:

Goes to show how immature all you people are. Its like you just skipped what happened on the first page... sighs..


I saw how it went it wasn't you who started it but you added to the fire, sometimes you just have to let things go man otherwise you will always end up in arguments and I'm sure you don't want that.


If you read everyline I didnt really add more fire until later on. I tried acting calm and stuff but these guys were just trying to pi-ss me off. I ignored Barker first reply but then he just decides to post another pointless reply because he wanted to start things.


Why can't you just ignore things like that? You let yourself get baited all the time and then you play the victim while arguing over nothing.

 


Because I was seeing how far I can get if I ignored barker 1st comment and trying to be calm with Frog but it didnt work as you can see if you read the whole t hread.

 

Anyways im making another Jak thread... lets see how this one goes Smiley Happy 


My point is that it's not a big deal, so don't make it into one. It's only an internet forum.

 


I wasnt expecting this reply from you so now I got to reply. This appies to you and everybody else who was argueing with me as well. So why cant you and everybody else do the same?

 

Oh yeah and once again again, I did to an extent.


I wasn't arguing with you at all. You need to read what I was saying in the context I used. If you do so, without getting defensive about it, you'll realise I wasn't.


Ok it seems like everyone else finally dropped this. Now can we?


There's nothing to drop.

Message 53 of 54 (81 Views)
0 Likes
Splicer
Registered: 09/11/2012
Offline
64 posts
 

Re: Jak and Daxter missing taunt (SuperBot)

Nov 21, 2012

 


Ok it seems like everyone else finally dropped this. Now can we?


There's nothing to drop.


 

Im talking about this whole discussion and thread -_-. I solved it for this purpose earlier.

Message 54 of 54 (78 Views)
0 Likes