IF Crash is included and they use his newer design, people have no right to complain. Be thankful he's in the game at all.
I swear, people always find the smallest thing to gripe about it's pathetic.
Um...of course they do. Naughty Dog's classic Crash was the face of the PS1. HE's the Crash everybody wants. If SuperBot/Sony give us new Crash, whose games sucked and were not highly associated with Playstation at all, then why should we act satisfied?
And please stop with this "we should be thankful" BS; I appreciate the game SupeBot has made for us, but even they've said countless times that this game only exists because we kept asking for it to be made. We're the consumers: if we say we want something in the game, Sony has to meet that demand if they want to make money.
Keep in mind, this game's not selling well right now. If Sony wants that to change, they have to cater to their fanbase. And giving us the bastardized Crash that we didn't ask for isn't good fan service (not to mention it probably wouldn't even be that profitable)
1. I don't care what Crash we get, as long as he is in I'll be happy. ( same goes with Spyro and Lara Croft)
2.If Crash get in, we are most likely to get this design for Crash since this was his latest game.
Ugh, the "entitlement" argument. Get back to me once you learn how consumerism works, okay?
Crash is Crash. Dante is Dante. Spyro is Spyro. Lara is Lara.
If you're list of demands are stacked up this high, there's no wonder the majority of this forum is filled with whiners and haters.
Sure, go ahead and call me, someone who has been on this forum supporting this game since the day it was announced (even before you), a "whiner" or "hater" because I have a certain expectation for a product when I pay for it. And I'm sure your "Crash is Crash" argument totally explains why Crash isn't even a profitable franchise anymore...
We're consumers. When we pay for something, we don't have to settle when we get what we didn't ask for. That's all I'm saying.