PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale

[HyperStory]

---

FidelityNy wrote:
I'll wait for an official announcement. All I know is if we don't get Crash AND Spyro, forget disappointment, I'm not interested at all.

---

While Crash should've been a prerequisite for this game, (He should've been the first 3rd party character they fought for, and they should've fought for him the hardest) Spyro was a lost cause from the beginning.

So I'm not that disappointed with Spyro not being in (and this is coming from a huge Spyro fan).

The lack of Crash though, I feel, is still a very valid argument. If it turns out that SuperBot did not fight their **bleep** of to get Crash, then they really, really screwed up.

[Astroking112]

Omar has pretty much confirmed that they tried to get Crash and couldn't, or that Activision or something would've messed him up so bad that it would be best to just not include him.

[FidelityNy]

I, personally, don't see either of them being lost causes, or characters you just dismiss. They should have both been faught for, they should be on the front cover, front and center. Spyro and Crash were apart of the first 5 titles I owned for Playstation when I was just a little kid. Everyone who had a Playstation in the 90's owned both Spyro, and Crash, no doubt.

[D-Squad3]

---

blondewolf41196 wrote:
^ Oct 10th.

---

Could be the 10th or 11th because he may give them the whole 10th. Then reveal on the 11th.

[stargateheaven]

My guess is the 11th.
Even if he reveals them, it makes no difference to us, we're still in the "are they really gonna be in? they said 20 characters!" argument.. lol

Also, what if there is a patch when you start the game and it adds all the characters? falls into:

20 character launch roster

No unlockable characters

Not DLC.

[Gekidami]

---

D-Squad3 wrote:

Are you prepared to accept the fact that x character isn't in even though Paul Gale was told x character was in?

---

It'll be proof that he's full of **bleep**, although he's shown that many times already. You know, on the 10th, he's either going to say Superbot told him not to say anything, or he's going to take a stab an the most asked for characters (i'm betting Crash, Sypro & probably a AC rep seeing as its a hot topic game and Sony have a DLC deal with Ubi). If they arent in he'll just say they were in negotiation and it didnt fall through. Being a BS'er on the internet where you have to supply no evidence of anything you say it way too easy.

So expect nothing from this guy, as always.

[TONESTER_925]

Lol I just wonder where all of these supposed "Sources" are coming from. It's a lot of dirty people in the gaming industry

[sovietprince]

ever since that bribe thing I have been taking everything his says with a grain of salt. I do hope he is legit though would love for some crash

[S-o-h-a-i-l]

I never listened to his bs, so it won't effect me the slightest.

[stargateheaven]

---

Gekidami wrote:

---

D-Squad3 wrote:

Are you prepared to accept the fact that x character isn't in even though Paul Gale was told x character was in?

---

It'll be proof that he's full of **bleep**, although he's shown that many times already.

So expect nothing from this guy, as always.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He's never been wrong.. so, dunno what you're talking about

---

sovietprince wrote:
ever since that bribe thing I have been taking everything his says with a grain of salt. I do hope he is legit though would love for some crash

---

There were never a "bribe thing". 

---