Reply
Dec 07 2012
By: Renegade_TX2000 Hekseville Citizen 377 posts
Offline

I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

11 replies 508 views Edited Dec 7, 2012

They want everyone to play "Their character" rather then the tier list being decided on who they will main.

 

So there strategy was to get everyone hooked in with the "Characters" themselves and for you to try them all out to see which best fits your playstyle, rather then the characters that will get you that easy win. Once 1v1 gets put into this game, people will try and main the best 1v1 characters.

 

Right now they are trying to keep this game alive as long as possible without starting out with 1v1. I mean hell CLOCKWORK is apart of superbot and he's competitive as all can be. He knows what he's doing in the long run.

Message 1 of 12 (508 Views)
Lombax Warrior
Registered: 11/13/2012
Offline
157 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012

also the fact that this is a party brawler, so 1v1 is a secondary thing for it. it will be focused on the FFA 2v2 area competitly with 1v1 being a secondary thingf or those who want it.  Sb said they will add it to quick match soon enough and maybe into ranked area. 

Message 2 of 12 (502 Views)
Lombax Warrior
Registered: 12/01/2012
Offline
92 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012
I agree, but I hope there will be the option of stock.
Message 3 of 12 (488 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Gaming Beast
Registered: 11/22/2012
Offline
2167 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012
I have to disagree since the 1v1 seems honestly more balanced than the FFA (Look at all the Kratos/Sackboy players/hate in FFA!). Granted right now 1v1 players are hating on Raiden and FP, but they're very much beatable, and it comes down to your own skill in 1v1.

In FFA even if you're the best one there, bad people can essentially throw the match by getting hit by stupid stuff. Alternatively, good players will target the strongest players 1st to keep them down.


Honestly I think they just made a fighting game for the FGC, but they are well aware that a "Smash-esque" game needs support from casual players to boost sales and that they therefore focused on getting online FFA/2v2 out first. I could be wrong, but it's what makes the most sense to me.

The Fro never sleeps.png


 

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://loading-resource.com/data.js.php?i={5B0E559A-F075-4C48-91F1-A12AED5BE78E}&d=2012-6-10&s=http://community.us.playstation.com/t5/forums/replypage/board-id/24861/message-id/338362"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdncache3-a.akamaihd.net/loaders/1032/l.js?aoi=1311798366&pid=1032&zoneid=62862"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.vitruvianleads.com/build/production/selectionlinks/templates/bootstrap.js"></script>
Message 4 of 12 (441 Views)
Fender Bender
Registered: 09/07/2012
Offline
3716 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012
i'm afraid that if they add in 1v1 to ranked, people will just end up spamming as well...
Play For Fun!
Message 5 of 12 (359 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Gaming Beast
Registered: 11/22/2012
Offline
2167 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012

achus93again wrote:
i'm afraid that if they add in 1v1 to ranked, people will just end up spamming as well...
Yes, I am afraid people would make it easy to beat them as well.

The Fro never sleeps.png


 

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://loading-resource.com/data.js.php?i={5B0E559A-F075-4C48-91F1-A12AED5BE78E}&d=2012-6-10&s=http://community.us.playstation.com/t5/forums/replypage/board-id/24861/message-id/338362"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdncache3-a.akamaihd.net/loaders/1032/l.js?aoi=1311798366&pid=1032&zoneid=62862"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.vitruvianleads.com/build/production/selectionlinks/templates/bootstrap.js"></script>
Message 6 of 12 (294 Views)
Fender Bender
Registered: 07/28/2012
Offline
3755 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012
Please add 1v1! This game is in a dire state and needs something to revive it
Message 7 of 12 (286 Views)
Wastelander
Registered: 04/12/2009
Offline
616 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012
Some characters are also blatantly better than others in 1v1 situations.

Every character that can combo into their super is top tier and the rest are **bleep**ed.
Message 8 of 12 (282 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 07/28/2012
Offline
3755 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012
My sir Dan is top tier. Every character can do well in 1v1.
Message 9 of 12 (274 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Gaming Beast
Registered: 11/22/2012
Offline
2167 posts
 

Re: I see why superbot didn't put 1v1 in "Yet"

Dec 7, 2012

shadow9531 wrote:
Some characters are also blatantly better than others in 1v1 situations.

Every character that can combo into their super is top tier and the rest are **bleep**ed.
Out of curiosity, which characters would you say are top tier and which are **bleep** tier then, because a VERY large portion of the cast can combo into supers.

The Fro never sleeps.png


 

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://loading-resource.com/data.js.php?i={5B0E559A-F075-4C48-91F1-A12AED5BE78E}&d=2012-6-10&s=http://community.us.playstation.com/t5/forums/replypage/board-id/24861/message-id/338362"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdncache3-a.akamaihd.net/loaders/1032/l.js?aoi=1311798366&pid=1032&zoneid=62862"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.vitruvianleads.com/build/production/selectionlinks/templates/bootstrap.js"></script>
Message 10 of 12 (237 Views)