Reply
Fender Bender
Registered: 04/11/2010
Online
4121 posts
 

Re: Gamespot review

Nov 21, 2012
"let's face it, Sony does not have a large collation of 1st party charters" .... WHAT, did i just hear that right?
-------------------
Iceyfire's youtube
Message 11 of 15 (66 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Keyblade Wielder
Registered: 10/11/2008
Offline
10160 posts
 

Re: Gamespot review

Nov 21, 2012
Anything below an 8 seems to be extremely bias. Hell, even the IGN review was pretty odd.

The IGN review they gave it an 8... after they praised the hell out of the game for weeks and then in the review itself made the game seem really really good.
Message 12 of 15 (61 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 04/11/2010
Online
4121 posts
 

Re: Gamespot review

Nov 21, 2012

Goldhawk1 wrote:
Anything below an 8 seems to be extremely bias. Hell, even the IGN review was pretty odd.

The IGN review they gave it an 8... after they praised the hell out of the game for weeks and then in the review itself made the game seem really really good.

Well Ign actually did have valid points which were

 

-story not having cut scenes 

-the menus sucked

and I forget the 3rd 

 

but yea I was expecting at lest a 8.5 from them 

-------------------
Iceyfire's youtube
Message 13 of 15 (59 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Keyblade Wielder
Registered: 10/11/2008
Offline
10160 posts
 

Re: Gamespot review

Nov 21, 2012

iceyfire54312 wrote:
"let's face it, Sony does not have a large collation of 1st party charters" .... WHAT, did i just hear that right?

LOL....sony has the largest amount of exclusives this gen, and out of the 20 characters, 15 of them are first party with 2 more first party character on the way...**bleep** is wrong with people these days?  

Message 14 of 15 (57 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
I Only Post Everything
Registered: 08/18/2012
Offline
1104 posts
 

Re: Gamespot review

Nov 21, 2012

iceyfire54312 wrote:

Goldhawk1 wrote:
Anything below an 8 seems to be extremely bias. Hell, even the IGN review was pretty odd.

The IGN review they gave it an 8... after they praised the hell out of the game for weeks and then in the review itself made the game seem really really good.

Well Ign actually did have valid points which were

 

-story not having cut scenes 

-the menus sucked

and I forget the 3rd 

 

but yea I was expecting at lest a 8.5 from them 


IGN's review scale is dfferent from most other sites. 8 is great on IGN.7 is good. So at Gameinformer a 7.5 would be average but at IGN thats a 5. 

This is relevant to my inetrest
Message 15 of 15 (48 Views)
Reply
0 Likes