So Nathan Drake, the star of one of the PS3's biggest selling franchises, is not an all-star simply because you don't like his games. Huh.
But seriously, you can't say that a character is objectively not an all-star simply because you don't like them. Hell, I hate Killzone, but I can see why Radec's in the game and wouldn't argue against his inclusion. This game isn't all about you.
Why is Nathan Drake considered an All-Star? Like I said, his games aren't anything special. It's Indiana Jones in interactive movie form. Whoop-dee-**bleep** doo. I don't think he is an All-Star, especially compared to the likes of the Big 3, Crash, Spyro, Spike, etc
I thought my reasoning for Cole was reasonable. The character is terrible, but the gameplay is interesting.
Not anything special? One of the best selling games on PS3, how is that for not anything special? The games were fun and action sequences excited. You must have not enjoyed it to describe it that way. And also most people enjoyed the story InFamous braught to the table, and they enjoyed Cole and his character, myself included. So your reasoining for cole is not as reasonable as you think. Of course this is your opinion and I am sure there is no way anyone can sway you.
Ignore TC he is a ******* idiot. He thinks his nostalgia characters are the "real" playstation allstars.
Just because it's new, doesn't mean it's good.
I should have expected the trolls to come in full force. :/
That's really it. It's merely your opinion whether you think Cole, and Nathan Drake are All-Stars. Just like how your opinion for Okami is that it's merely a Zelda Clone. Majority will definitely disagree with you on those tastes. But that's merely it. Your taste. I don't have to treat your opinion as fact but I can say I can agree/disagree with you.
And whether I actually do, well... Somewhat but, not fully.