
07-16-2009 01:49 AM
There's been a lot of talk about chosing between the Go! and other systems. A whole lot of people are having trouble deciding. I've researched the PSP GO! and the 3000, and I am now going to compare them in this short article.
PSP GO!
Overview:

It actually looks pretty radical.
Strengths:
Weaknesses
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Problems:
Most people are saying that the incapability to play UMD's is a real problem the Go!. Well, Yeah, it is. The PlayStation Store doesn't have many games, but I'm sure (and I hope) that there will be more games in the online store in the future. Besides, Sony will eventually rid of all games in others stores, so we'll pretty much have to buy the Go! while prices are still low.
Another problem that the Go! faces is it's small screen. It is almost half the size of the 3000's. That makes it harder to play games, and watch videos.
Some Players are complaining that some things on the go! are too small, like the buttons, screen, and latches. that can be a real problem.
My conclusion on the PSP Go! is this, It's portable. lightweight, good for downloading media, and may even support the latest version of Flash Player. Having said that, there's not all good things to say about it. No UMD door, Tiny screen, High price, are all dilemmas that the Go! will face. I personally think that the Go! will make a fine addition to the PlayStation family. My Grade for it; B.
PSP 3000

Strengths:
Weaknesses:
None so far...
Memory:
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
64 MB of Internal Flash memory
The PlayStation not-so Portable 3000 System is great for Playing games and watching videos. There not good at downloads though. Yet the PSP 3000 has made it to the family with a BANG. So I give it a B+.
The PSP Go! is a little better than the PSP 3000 because it can do everything the 3000 can do, plus more. I say, as long as you have PSP Go! money, you should buy the go. I know I'm getting one. I hope this article helped.
07-16-2009 02:24 AM
RedArmy93 wrote:
All PSP's that came after the 1000 series have 64mb of internal memory. So if it is a weakness, it goes for the Go too. None of the PSP's is any more portable than the next. None of them are too heavy, or too big to not be portable. Portability is not a strength of the PSP Go, since it is as portable as any other PSP. Also, the screen is not half the size on the go, it is .5" smaller than the 3000's, nothing more nothing less. Though it does seem a little too much on the small side when compared side by side.
Well said.
07-16-2009 03:24 AM
07-16-2009 04:27 AM
RedArmy93 wrote:
All PSP's that came after the 1000 series have 64mb of internal memory. So if it is a weakness, it goes for the Go too. None of the PSP's is any more portable than the next. None of them are too heavy, or too big to be portable. Portability is not a strength of the PSP Go, since it is as portable as any other PSP. Also, the screen is not half the size on the go, it is .5" smaller than the 3000's, nothing more nothing less. Though it does seem a little too much on the small side when compared side by side.Message Edited by RedArmy93 on 07-16-2009 03:24 AM
I think his point was that the Go! is smaller/lighter then previous models so it is easy to port around. I can't imagine you thought he was saying that a PlayStation Portable wasn't portable?
07-16-2009 05:24 AM
Rabnnod wrote:
RedArmy93 wrote:
All PSP's that came after the 1000 series have 64mb of internal memory. So if it is a weakness, it goes for the Go too. None of the PSP's is any more portable than the next. None of them are too heavy, or too big to be portable. Portability is not a strength of the PSP Go, since it is as portable as any other PSP. Also, the screen is not half the size on the go, it is .5" smaller than the 3000's, nothing more nothing less. Though it does seem a little too much on the small side when compared side by side.Message Edited by RedArmy93 on 07-16-2009 03:24 AMI think his point was that the Go! is smaller/lighter then previous models so it is easy to port around. I can't imagine you thought he was saying that a PlayStation Portable wasn't portable?
It is only a fraction lighter and smaller than the 3000. But all in all, you can take any model of PSP anywhere and play it. They are the same when it comes to where you can go with it.
07-16-2009 06:11 AM
07-16-2009 06:51 AM
u_r_f1ni5hed wrote:There's been a lot of talk about chosing between the Go! and other systems. A whole lot of people are having trouble deciding. I've researched the PSP GO! and the 3000, and I am now going to compare them in this short article.
PSP GO
It actually looks pretty radical.
Strengths:
- Portability
- Flip Screen
- Volume latch
Weaknesses
- No AV/Remote Control Jack
- Smaller Screen
- No UMD Door
Memory:
Strengths:
- 16 GB of Internal Flash Memory.
- Up to 32GB of portable media.
- Better for updates, downloadable games, movies, and hopefully more.
- Memory Stick Micro compatible
Weaknesses:
- None so far...
Good comparison. But No AV? It has an AV port, otherwise they would not be selling new Composite
and Component AV cables for the PSP Go.
And another strength for the Go is the Bluetooth.
07-16-2009 07:03 AM
I must start by saying that this review does not seem very acurate or complete.
The Go has bluetooth for one (as the poster above me ,entioned) that you did not at all.
From what i understand the Go has a Docking port for all extra periphials to work through (charging, usb, Av cables, etc). So it does still have those features, just need to buy new ones.
The Go and the 1000-3000 will all be able to use the same downloadable content (as far as ive heard) so the Go is no better at downloading, updating, or any of that.
Then for your conclusion, u rate the Go at B and 3000 at B+ yet recommend the Go despite it being $80 more? Doesnt make sence to me.
I have a 2000 and dont plan on upgrading but i think that the Go is a better design but not worth the price.
Just my opinions
07-16-2009 08:05 AM
RedArmy93 wrote:
Rabnnod wrote:
RedArmy93 wrote:
All PSP's that came after the 1000 series have 64mb of internal memory. So if it is a weakness, it goes for the Go too. None of the PSP's is any more portable than the next. None of them are too heavy, or too big to be portable. Portability is not a strength of the PSP Go, since it is as portable as any other PSP. Also, the screen is not half the size on the go, it is .5" smaller than the 3000's, nothing more nothing less. Though it does seem a little too much on the small side when compared side by side.Message Edited by RedArmy93 on 07-16-2009 03:24 AMI think his point was that the Go! is smaller/lighter then previous models so it is easy to port around. I can't imagine you thought he was saying that a PlayStation Portable wasn't portable?
It is only a fraction lighter and smaller than the 3000. But all in all, you can take any model of PSP anywhere and play it. They are the same when it comes to where you can go with it.
If by a fraction you mean 43% lighter then sure. Thats only about half as much. Not arguing that the 1k, 2k, 3k series is not portable but the weight difference between the models is very noticable.
07-16-2009 09:43 AM
Think they have let themselves down by not having a touch screen. This makes a massive difference for web and data input. Also - any sign of Mac support? Its becoming a very popular platform now and shouldn't be ignored.