Reply
Highlighted
Dec 08 2006
By: BizkitLibre~ Fender Bender 3503 posts
Offline

atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

18 replies 3 views Edited Dec 8, 2006
whats better



Message 1 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Treasure Hunter
Registered: 05/28/2006
Offline
5734 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006
mp3 i think
Message 2 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Ghost of Sparta
Registered: 02/05/2005
Offline
16138 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006
atrac, sounds just as good, file size is like 5 times smaller.
Message 3 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Gaming Beast
Registered: 12/02/2005
Offline
2479 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006


NavS. wrote:
atrac, sounds just as good, file size is like 5 times smaller.


it depends ATRAC arent smaller if ran at the same quality.
Message 4 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Ghost of Sparta
Registered: 02/05/2005
Offline
16138 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006


wierdo gamer wrote:


NavS. wrote:
atrac, sounds just as good, file size is like 5 times smaller.


it depends ATRAC arent smaller if ran at the same quality.


All of mine ar at 42kbp.... mp3s are usually 128kbp, 96kbp or lower sounds bad in my opinion...
Message 5 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Gaming Beast
Registered: 12/02/2005
Offline
2479 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006


NavS. wrote:


wierdo gamer wrote:


NavS. wrote:
atrac, sounds just as good, file size is like 5 times smaller.


it depends ATRAC arent smaller if ran at the same quality.


All of mine ar at 42kbp.... mp3s are usually 128kbp, 96kbp or lower sounds bad in my opinion...


imo mp3 are better than atracs but wma give u more bang for the size
Message 6 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 07/16/2006
Offline
4587 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006
mp3
Message 7 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Ghost of Sparta
Registered: 02/05/2005
Offline
16138 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006


wierdo gamer wrote:


NavS. wrote:


wierdo gamer wrote:


NavS. wrote:
atrac, sounds just as good, file size is like 5 times smaller.


it depends ATRAC arent smaller if ran at the same quality.


All of mine ar at 42kbp.... mp3s are usually 128kbp, 96kbp or lower sounds bad in my opinion...


imo mp3 are better than atracs but wma give u more bang for the size


Yeah I've seen those get as low as 1mb per song, just like atracs.... I mean it's pretty critical when you only have 2gb or less on your stick....
Message 8 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Gaming Beast
Registered: 12/02/2005
Offline
2479 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006


NavS. wrote:


wierdo gamer wrote:


NavS. wrote:


wierdo gamer wrote:


NavS. wrote:
atrac, sounds just as good, file size is like 5 times smaller.


it depends ATRAC arent smaller if ran at the same quality.


All of mine ar at 42kbp.... mp3s are usually 128kbp, 96kbp or lower sounds bad in my opinion...


imo mp3 are better than atracs but wma give u more bang for the size


Yeah I've seen those get as low as 1mb per song, just like atracs.... I mean it's pretty critical when you only have 2gb or less on your stick....


yea i use wma because my 4gig library goes down to about 1gig and 1/2
Message 9 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 10/27/2005
Offline
1445 posts
 

Re: atrac, mp3, wma, or acc

Dec 8, 2006
i suggest aac cause the quality is good and the file size depends on the length of song (eg. 3:07 mins=3.0 mb)
Message 10 of 19 (3 Views)
Reply
0 Likes