Reply
Treasure Hunter
Registered: 09/27/2005
Offline
9122 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006


eman94 wrote:
If you knew a little about theoretical physics, you would know that traveling at the speed of light is impossible. Even if we had the technology, it would not work. Only objects with the same substance as light can do that. But there is nothing like that, hence lightspeed travel is impossible.



what about a drivesytem that uses Light to propel the machine at the speed of light?
Photobucket - Video and Image HostingWe Dig Giant Robots!!!!
Message 21 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Umbrella Scientist
Registered: 10/24/2006
Offline
13860 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006


Sly should go PSP wrote:


eman94 wrote:
If you knew a little about theoretical physics, you would know that traveling at the speed of light is impossible. Even if we had the technology, it would not work. Only objects with the same substance as light can do that. But there is nothing like that, hence lightspeed travel is impossible.


Did i say it WAS possible? I said 'in theory'.



This is a "what if" thing.
If the laws of physics were not relevant,time travel would be easy.
Message 22 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 07/17/2004
Offline
1661 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006
If Time Travel was given 2 the public there would be chaos, people could easily go back in time and kill people they don't like, people important, change inventions, etc..., destroy the earth itself, convicts could also go hide in different time periods, etc... again, basically, I don't think earth would ever be ready 4 time travel, there's just 2 much @ stake...
Message 23 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Treasure Hunter
Registered: 02/06/2004
Offline
8161 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006
I dont understand this concept of Light and Time.....Light is quite fast but it too is subject to being measured by time.

Speed IMO has little to do with Time Travel.....well actually i think everything has little to do with time travel because it's not possible
Account Removed due to Inactivity.

Thanks for being a part of my life PSU
Message 24 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/17/2005
Offline
3140 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006
try asking this guy....



Message 25 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/07/2006
Offline
4319 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006
My brain is throbbin thanks to you.
HEY GUEESSS WHAT!! THIS POST MEANS NOTINHGGGG ISNT THAT JUST WONDERFUL!!!!!

+0 ftw!
Message 26 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Umbrella Scientist
Registered: 10/24/2006
Offline
13860 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006


*C-STARZ*PUSHA wrote:
If Time Travel was given 2 the public there would be chaos, people could easily go back in time and kill people they don't like, people important, change inventions, etc..., destroy the earth itself, convicts could also go hide in different time periods, etc... again, basically, I don't think earth would ever be ready 4 time travel, there's just 2 much @ stake...



If that happens,universe theory,one universe with said object,one with out.
Message 27 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 09/14/2006
Offline
3560 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006


Lt. Claybon wrote:
I dont understand this concept of Light and Time.....Light is quite fast but it too is subject to being measured by time.

Speed IMO has little to do with Time Travel.....well actually i think everything has little to do with time travel because it's not possible


Exactly.


But no need to get THAT simple.
Message 28 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 10/22/2006
Offline
3303 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 28, 2006
The effort to answer would be futile.
Think before you act. It will save me the effort of correcting you.
"if World of Warcraft and Modern Warfare had a baby this is what we would get"- DarthGooch
Message 29 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 08/02/2004
Offline
3861 posts
 

Re: Time traveling.

Nov 29, 2006
(Your asking the wrong place,Sir.I don't this is the right place of discussion on this board.I have a site that does talk about the unknown if you want it,pm me bro.)

im studying physics and time travel dilation does occur. time in a moving frame of reference(i.e a rocket) goes slower than time in a stationary frame relative to an oberver in the stationary frame. To an observer in the moving frame(the rocket) time goes normally. For example, if one year passes in the rocket ship relative to a crewmember in the ship, more time will pass for an observer on earth (2.3 years at 0.8c). if the rocket returns to earth it will return to the earth's future.

this has been experimented before by having 2 clocks. one of the clock remained stationary while the other was placed in a plane which travelled around the world. once it returned the clock that travelled around the world was behind a second. weird eh.
Reversing the process of the whole universe ?

Unlikely... At the least...

Well,No, because we would see time travelers all over the place right now. Some claim that if you go back in time, you may go into an alternate reality, and that's why we don't see time travelers now. But think about that logic... If we go into another reality, then THOSE people are experiencing time travelers popping into their universe... why aren't we? Shouldn't people from other "realities" be coming back in time and somehow ending up in our universe? Unless you want to be arrogant and say we are the "Default" universe for lack of a better term.

Time is really just a result of perception, it doesn't exist independently
I say limited to the past because in theory the future doesn’t exist yet.
Its funny that that proves if you go forward in time then go back then go forward agene the 2nd time you go forward would be different from the first time you went.
 even if there were some way to travel back and forward through time, wouldn't the person traveling age with the time?
ex: travel backwards in time, get younger, travel forward, older


"
Message 30 of 53 (1 View)
Reply
0 Likes