Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Reply
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 09/07/2005
Offline
1441 posts
 

Re: Breaking News Possible iPhone name change.

Jan 11, 2007


MUNCHINMAN wrote:
MUNCHINMAN wrote:
wow, crisco is retarted, whats a better name than iphone for and apple phone?



*EDog046* wrote:
Cisco has owned the trademark for "iPhone" since before the iPod was released



i just said that iphone was a good name and what could be better than that name, so your point is?


      
You said that CIsco is retarded for using that name, but when they trademarked it Apple hadn't released the iPod yet.  Cisco has every right to sue Apple, Apple is using their trademark without their permission.


Please use plain text.
Message 11 of 13 (0 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Treasure Hunter
Registered: 12/04/2005
Offline
7338 posts
 

Re: Breaking News Possible iPhone name change.

Jan 11, 2007


Hofman101 wrote:
They have every right to sue, and frankly should. But it's stupid how alot of company want to sue giant companies like Sony and Apple just for publicity and their money.


Message Edited by Hofman101 on 01-10-2007 05:49 PM


I'm pretty sure Cisco is a larger company than Apple.
Please use plain text.
Message 12 of 13 (0 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Keyblade Wielder
Registered: 03/12/2005
Offline
11292 posts
 

Re: Breaking News Possible iPhone name change.

Jan 11, 2007


lancer8869 wrote:


Hofman101 wrote:
They have every right to sue, and frankly should. But it's stupid how alot of company want to sue giant companies like Sony and Apple just for publicity and their money.


Message Edited by Hofman101 on 01-10-2007 05:49 PM


I'm pretty sure Cisco is a larger company than Apple.


Ha, no. I wonder if Apple owns a copyright to the prefix "i" though. Anyways, Apple will probably settle.
Please use plain text.
Message 13 of 13 (0 Views)
Reply
0 Likes