MAG © 2013 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc.. MAG developed by Zipper Interactive. “PlayStation”, “PLAYSTATION” and “PS” Family logo are registered trademarks of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. The PlayStation®Network Logo is a service mark of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. The Sony Computer Entertainment logo is a registered trademark of Sony Corporation
PlayStation.com - Terms of Use // Privacy Policy // Comment Policy // PlayStation.Blog is Powered by WordPress.
turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Swordsman24 wrote:
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
Lol I see the hostility towards R*S and that's pretty much expected. It's not my place to say that we're the best clan of all time but think about this..R*S has been around since the private beta and sure, our CB record isn't fantastic but at this stage in MAG, (as far as SVER clans go) R*S is the only clan that can still field 32 of our own original roster. Doesn't that count for something? And I'm not knocking 3C or anything, of course they deserve the mention in this thread. They're a no brainer. So my point is, are the clans being mentioned/not being mentioned here are based off their wins/losses in CBs or just the personal issues people have with other clans?
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been in R*S since May so I wasn't there for the 3C/R*S beef nor do I know about any other problems we've may have had with other clans or people.
R*S refused to Q^ when all the old clans were still around (scared much??) Most of the old clans no longer exist on MAG (whats the point on recruiting players on a dead game) which is perfectly fine seeing as chances are you won't find players on MAG anymore in which you could possibly bring over to another game and play competitively.
Most of the old clans still have their old MAG rosters, but people play different games/ are waiting for a game everybody likes ie. DUST. So for any clan to say they are the "best clan" based upon longevity is a joke(not just R*S).
I hear ya, we do plan on moving to other games of course lol (pretty sure that goes for everyone). So if longevity doesn't count, what should? (This question goes for everyone reading btw)
honestly it's how you perform on games other than MAG seeing as theres nothing hard about MAG.
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
Lol I see the hostility towards R*S and that's pretty much expected. It's not my place to say that we're the best clan of all time but think about this..R*S has been around since the private beta and sure, our CB record isn't fantastic but at this stage in MAG, (as far as SVER clans go) R*S is the only clan that can still field 32 of our own original roster. Doesn't that count for something? And I'm not knocking 3C or anything, of course they deserve the mention in this thread. They're a no brainer. So my point is, are the clans being mentioned/not being mentioned here are based off their wins/losses in CBs or just the personal issues people have with other clans?
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been in R*S since May so I wasn't there for the 3C/R*S beef nor do I know about any other problems we've may have had with other clans or people.
R*S refused to Q^ when all the old clans were still around (scared much??) Most of the old clans no longer exist on MAG (whats the point on recruiting players on a dead game) which is perfectly fine seeing as chances are you won't find players on MAG anymore in which you could possibly bring over to another game and play competitively.
Most of the old clans still have their old MAG rosters, but people play different games/ are waiting for a game everybody likes ie. DUST. So for any clan to say they are the "best clan" based upon longevity is a joke(not just R*S).
I hear ya, we do plan on moving to other games of course lol (pretty sure that goes for everyone). So if longevity doesn't count, what should? (This question goes for everyone reading btw)
honestly it's how you perform on games other than MAG seeing as theres nothing hard about MAG.
Lol@Jumpman for taking gaming so seriously! What a Loser coming to the forums commenting .Mag was a "Dead Game" wasn't it? so why come here lol. Shouldn't you be in the Kz3 forums trolling there or how about the socamp4 forums trolling and bragging on how your so good at video game you Loser!lol Oh and all the 3C nerds who will come here to troll this post LOL Defend your boyfriend Jumpman(aka MAG's Legend!) LOL !
StupiD_ChangO--- wrote:
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
Lol I see the hostility towards R*S and that's pretty much expected. It's not my place to say that we're the best clan of all time but think about this..R*S has been around since the private beta and sure, our CB record isn't fantastic but at this stage in MAG, (as far as SVER clans go) R*S is the only clan that can still field 32 of our own original roster. Doesn't that count for something? And I'm not knocking 3C or anything, of course they deserve the mention in this thread. They're a no brainer. So my point is, are the clans being mentioned/not being mentioned here are based off their wins/losses in CBs or just the personal issues people have with other clans?
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been in R*S since May so I wasn't there for the 3C/R*S beef nor do I know about any other problems we've may have had with other clans or people.
R*S refused to Q^ when all the old clans were still around (scared much??) Most of the old clans no longer exist on MAG (whats the point on recruiting players on a dead game) which is perfectly fine seeing as chances are you won't find players on MAG anymore in which you could possibly bring over to another game and play competitively.
Most of the old clans still have their old MAG rosters, but people play different games/ are waiting for a game everybody likes ie. DUST. So for any clan to say they are the "best clan" based upon longevity is a joke(not just R*S).
I hear ya, we do plan on moving to other games of course lol (pretty sure that goes for everyone). So if longevity doesn't count, what should? (This question goes for everyone reading btw)
honestly it's how you perform on games other than MAG seeing as theres nothing hard about MAG.
Lol@Jumpman for taking gaming so seriously! What a Loser coming to the forums commenting .Mag was a "Dead Game" wasn't it? so why come here lol. Shouldn't you be in the Kz3 forums trolling there or how about the socamp4 forums trolling and bragging on how your so good at video game you Loser!lol Oh and all the 3C nerds who will come here to troll this post LOL Defend your boyfriend Jumpman(aka MAG's Legend!) LOL !
Seems like you're taking things a little too serious, especially for someone hating on another for taking something too seriously.
StupiD_ChangO--- wrote:
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
Lol I see the hostility towards R*S and that's pretty much expected. It's not my place to say that we're the best clan of all time but think about this..R*S has been around since the private beta and sure, our CB record isn't fantastic but at this stage in MAG, (as far as SVER clans go) R*S is the only clan that can still field 32 of our own original roster. Doesn't that count for something? And I'm not knocking 3C or anything, of course they deserve the mention in this thread. They're a no brainer. So my point is, are the clans being mentioned/not being mentioned here are based off their wins/losses in CBs or just the personal issues people have with other clans?
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been in R*S since May so I wasn't there for the 3C/R*S beef nor do I know about any other problems we've may have had with other clans or people.
R*S refused to Q^ when all the old clans were still around (scared much??) Most of the old clans no longer exist on MAG (whats the point on recruiting players on a dead game) which is perfectly fine seeing as chances are you won't find players on MAG anymore in which you could possibly bring over to another game and play competitively.
Most of the old clans still have their old MAG rosters, but people play different games/ are waiting for a game everybody likes ie. DUST. So for any clan to say they are the "best clan" based upon longevity is a joke(not just R*S).
I hear ya, we do plan on moving to other games of course lol (pretty sure that goes for everyone). So if longevity doesn't count, what should? (This question goes for everyone reading btw)
honestly it's how you perform on games other than MAG seeing as theres nothing hard about MAG.
Lol@Jumpman for taking gaming so seriously! What a Loser coming to the forums commenting .Mag was a "Dead Game" wasn't it? so why come here lol. Shouldn't you be in the Kz3 forums trolling there or how about the socamp4 forums trolling and bragging on how your so good at video game you Loser!lol Oh and all the 3C nerds who will come here to troll this post LOL Defend your boyfriend Jumpman(aka MAG's Legend!) LOL !
xjumpman23 wrote:
StupiD_ChangO--- wrote:
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
xjumpman23 wrote:
Swordsman24 wrote:
Lol I see the hostility towards R*S and that's pretty much expected. It's not my place to say that we're the best clan of all time but think about this..R*S has been around since the private beta and sure, our CB record isn't fantastic but at this stage in MAG, (as far as SVER clans go) R*S is the only clan that can still field 32 of our own original roster. Doesn't that count for something? And I'm not knocking 3C or anything, of course they deserve the mention in this thread. They're a no brainer. So my point is, are the clans being mentioned/not being mentioned here are based off their wins/losses in CBs or just the personal issues people have with other clans?
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been in R*S since May so I wasn't there for the 3C/R*S beef nor do I know about any other problems we've may have had with other clans or people.
R*S refused to Q^ when all the old clans were still around (scared much??) Most of the old clans no longer exist on MAG (whats the point on recruiting players on a dead game) which is perfectly fine seeing as chances are you won't find players on MAG anymore in which you could possibly bring over to another game and play competitively.
Most of the old clans still have their old MAG rosters, but people play different games/ are waiting for a game everybody likes ie. DUST. So for any clan to say they are the "best clan" based upon longevity is a joke(not just R*S).
I hear ya, we do plan on moving to other games of course lol (pretty sure that goes for everyone). So if longevity doesn't count, what should? (This question goes for everyone reading btw)
honestly it's how you perform on games other than MAG seeing as theres nothing hard about MAG.
Lol@Jumpman for taking gaming so seriously! What a Loser coming to the forums commenting .Mag was a "Dead Game" wasn't it? so why come here lol. Shouldn't you be in the Kz3 forums trolling there or how about the socamp4 forums trolling and bragging on how your so good at video game you Loser!lol Oh and all the 3C nerds who will come here to troll this post LOL Defend your boyfriend Jumpman(aka MAG's Legend!) LOL !
Now you know he mad!
