Both new.
I guess the moral of the story is: if you're going to release crappy game that goes against everything your fans wanted, at least package it in a small form factor so it doesn't take up too much storage room when it gets to sit idle on the shelves for six months.
http://www.gamestop.ca/ps3/killzone-3-helghast-edi
GuilhermeB wrote:
Both new.
I guess the moral of the story is: if you're going to release crappy game that goes against everything your fans wanted, at least package it in a small form factor so it doesn't take up too much storage room when it gets to sit idle on the shelves for six months.
http://www.gamestop.ca/ps3/killzone-3-helghast-edi
tion/308005
dude what is your point lol? kz3 helghast is 80 bucks plus tax out the door. I have both games kz2 and kz3 and kz3 is better so why post a link for a 79.99 helghast edition.? kz3 is more fun while kz2 alot like I like kz3 better. I am getting ready to purchase a helghast edition for 79.99 because the helmet is awesome.
What he was referring to was that Gamestop Canada tends to have these "Door Crasher" events every now and again to get rid of excess stock, and it just so happens that for the one day they had the Killzone 3 Helghast Edition for 29.89 I believe, or something to that effect. One day sale, nothing more, nothing less.
marine_man26 wrote:
GuilhermeB wrote:
Both new.
I guess the moral of the story is: if you're going to release crappy game that goes against everything your fans wanted, at least package it in a small form factor so it doesn't take up too much storage room when it gets to sit idle on the shelves for six months.
http://www.gamestop.ca/ps3/killzone-3-helghast-edi
tion/308005 dude what is your point lol? kz3 helghast is 80 bucks plus tax out the door. I have both games kz2 and kz3 and kz3 is better so why post a link for a 79.99 helghast edition.? kz3 is more fun while kz2 alot like I like kz3 better. I am getting ready to purchase a helghast edition for 79.99 because the helmet is awesome.
You are ? well, dude, hurry up before it drops again to 29,89 and makes you look like a jackass.
marine_man26 wrote:
Yeah I am exactly right on that one. you see atleast KZ3 when you pull up your scope to aim and shoot someone you actually can. Kz2 when you go to shoot someone with your assault rifle welp you better make sure they are a good ways away because your not going to have time pulling up your gun therefore you have to put the x on someone rather then getting to use a guns sights. pretty crappy if you ask me for a game thats supposed to be so much better then KZ3
Actually, the time it takes to pull up your sights isn't the problem. That time is reasonable and not much longer than in Killzone 3. The big difference is that the rate at which your character turns his head and looks up and down in Killzone 2 is too slow to track a close enemy (but it's not like you need to or should be using your sights at point blank range anyway -- so it's really only a problem at medium range).
It makes sense that this is much improved in Killzone 3 since everyone complained about this issue in Killzone 2. Unfortunately it's pretty much the one improvement over Killzone 2, and it hardly makes Killzone 3 better than Killzone 2 considering a lot of good features were removed (er, excuse me, "not re-developed" in GG parlance) or "re-developed" into something less effective (matchmaking vs. server browser, for example).
Support
Corporate
Community
