that's crazy cause i totally think Jak 2 is better then Jak 3! I remember awhile back Jak 2 got into the top 50 hardest games of all time(I can't find a link for that you'd have to search the PSN forums).
I think both the first two Jak games are better. Since Jak and Ratchet aren't as popular it seems like they only wanted one of each on the list. If UYA is #91, GC should be only a few spots behind it since its so similar. A little different for Jak because it got so low on the list but it should be higher.
Its not a very good list anyway. The games should be included because they are still great. Pong isn't.
In gameinformers newest issue Jak 3 is ranked #193 in the Best 200 games of all time. Its not the best rank but itleast its in there!
When you think about it, rankings, reviews, etc. are all opinions. Personally, I liked Jak II more than 3.
i found jak 3 more fun. im too useless with electronics to complete jak 2
cant get past the final boss waaaaaaaaa even tho my bro instructed me how to do it.
comedy.its no joke.
92% of teens have switched to Rap music, if you are part of the 8% that still rock out everyday, put this in your signature. Kudos! Thanks!
i think the problem is when they made it, they thought about how good the game was BACK THEN. if they compared NOW, it would be a much better situation. Dr. Mario? beats Jak 3? totally lame. Dr. Mario is hardly a game at all
Pretty much. That's why I don't really prefer these types of lists, they merely serve as a form of nostalgia. Games that are higher up on the list are there because they had some sentimental value. And I agree, you can't really compare Dr. Mario with Jak 3 fairly. Jak 3 has more value and gameplay elements than Dr. Mario, so a lot of people would find it better. Rather than create a list of top games of all time, I think creating a list of top games every year is more appopriate instead.