I trust you all have played Black Ops or MW3? Well, I'm here to discuss the issue of MW3 vs. Black Ops. Here we go.
Black Ops's Pros: - has zombies
- great maps for zombies
- gameplay is by far more different than any Call of Duty games
Cons: - small multiplayer maps
- campaign is overall very easy
- COD points
MW3's Pros: - awesome multiplayer
- game mode Infected and etc.
- cool maps
Cons: - Akimbo!!! :/
- stupid Survival mode
- small maps
- boring campaign
- should be named Modern Warfare 2.5
All in all, I give Black Ops 10 out of ten.
MW3 1.5 out of ten.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Honestly, I think that you are too harsh on MW3 and too forgiving of Black Ops.
I would give Black Ops an overall score of 8 out of 10 when I used to play it as the Multiplayer maps were pretty fun and Zombies is unlimited hours of entertainment.
As for MW3, I give it a 6.5 out of 10 since Survival was not as great as it was cracked up to be, I was expecting more from the campaign, and the maps are too cramped IMO.
You asked for our opinion so I gave you mine.
I find that Black Ops Zombies is, and always will be, way better than MW3 Survival mode.
Even though I have never played MW3 just seen youtube gameplay of survival mode I would still have to say I would still choose zombie over survival. Survival it may look interesting but after about five minutes with the dog and heli. sort of got bored of watching.
zombies is better because its "zombies" so its catchy, fun to play because its not like mw3 campaign with alive humans, and has more elements to it then survival
Zombies is infinitely better. There's characters, there's a story, there's epic, epic easter eggs, and Treyarch throws as much cool stuff into the zombie mode as they can. It's on different maps from the single player/multiplayer and it's got an incredible sense of style.
Survival mode is just waves upon waves of enemies coming at you. There's no story, no characters, no easter eggs, no new maps, no new style...it's just as simple as "Kill enemies, buy more weapons/perks/killstreaks, reload. Kill enemies, buy more weapons/perks/killstreaks, reload."
Probably a gross oversimplification of Survival Mode, but not too far from the mark at all. Survival mode is fun...but it gets tedious and monotonous after a couple of times, IMO.
Those guys who took the time to get the "Unstoppable" Title?? Yeah...not sure how they had the patience/inclination to do it.
EDIT: And if you like Infected on MW3, you should try it on Halo Reach. MUCH better implementation, IMO.
id just like to say BO is better in multiplayer and the campaign had a great story BUT mw3 had a great story and simple multiplayer, as 4 the survival vs zombies id say it depends on what you want to do, do u want to spill undead brains across the floor or do u want to play with enemies that are smarter and shoot back, in zombies u have to get touched to die but in survival there are more ways to die (scary thought), i perfer survival its ofers a different challange then "back up and gun". u realy cant compare BO to MW3 couse the styles are completly different. there both good and u should leave it at that.