AriesWarlock wrote:
CaptainAlbator wrote:
Dayed wrote:
it should because then i would actually play it and i do want to play it but i havnt gotten it yet because i dont wanna put 10-20 hours on a game that doesnt have trophy support
How about you play it because you want to try something different? Back in the day we didn't have trophies, acheivements, or anything of the sort. We played games because they were... what's the word... oh yeah, FUN.
As for Heavenly Sword, Sony wouldn't be the ones to implement any kind of trophy support. It would have to be Ninja Theory. It's their game, and anyone else would have to be contracted out by Ninja Theory. Being that it's a five year old game, I'd say it's safe to assume that we're not going to get trophies. Ninja Theory is currently working on DMC, a prequel to Devil May Cry. You can try contacting them here;
http://www.ninjatheory.com/index.php
Unfortunately, not everybody is as old as those who played back in the day, and trophies have become a source of motivation for some, like it or not. I enjoyed the game, but trophies would give me more incentive to replay it. The loading times also put me off, so a patch like this would be a win-win.
MGS4 is 4 years old and it got the patch. Ninja Theory may have made the game, but the data belong to Sony. If they can get NT to make a patch, good. If not, get someone else to do it.
So age is directly correlated to someone having fun and the pursuit of virtual trophies? That's a blanket generalization that I really don't think is true.
I don't know how this "gamer" idea that if a game is unsupported, that somehow it falls under Sony's dominion started, but it's a misconception that I keep seeing repeated, and despite the popular belief, if something is repeated it doesn't become "fact". Sony serves as PUBLISHER of the game. Meaning they did all the work to get the game into your hands. Ninja Theory did all the work to actually MAKE the game. I don't know the legal dealings, as such things are often not privy to public consumption, but Sony would most likely not have what's known as creative control. Meaning it's still up to Ninja Theory to go back and do any addtional work on the game. What you suggest would be akin to Capitol/EMI Records demanding The Beatles go back and make another album, and if they refused they would then hire a new band. And no, it's not "different because it's video games".
Metal Gear Solid 4 is an entirely different animal. You can't honestly compare the two.
